Was one law depending upon the construction of the Postal Convention with France of 24th Sept. 1856, which is to be found in the 10th Vol. of Hertslet's Treaties to p.108. (copies annexed).
That the further opinion of the Queen's Advocate was conveyed in a letter from Lord Clarendon to the French Minister (copy enclosed).
6. That there could be no doubt that the Arabs subsidized by Your Lordship were bearing upon the question he (M Holland) was to state that in 1869 the Queen's Advocate was consulted as to the legality of an arrest at Hong Kong of the Messageries Imperiales Steamer "Sere" (or "Segre") on board.
4. That in his first opinion he assumed that the "Tigre" conveyance was not engaged in the conveyance of correspondence, but of luggage only; on that assumption he reported that the "Tigre" was not employed in execution of Articles 1 & 2 of the Convention so as to be within the scope of Art. V.
5. That the French Ambassador, when informed of that opinion, remonstrated against it, stating that the "Tigre", by the French Government, was employed...
7. That Your Lordship requested to be favored with our opinion upon the following questions:
1. Whether a French vessel engaged in the French Government Postal Service and called in either regularly or occasionally in the course of her voyage at some British Port, was exempt under the terms of the Postal Convention from the liability which attached to all other vessels for any damage which she might have done in collision with any other vessel.
2. Whether, if such a vessel was not within the...
was
one
?
law depending upon of the construction of the Protal Convention with France of 24th Sept. 1856, which is to be found in the 10th V1l. of Herblets Treaties to 108. (copies annexed).
that
3 That
ao
& the farther opinion of the De Advocate was
226
conveyed in a letter from Lord Clarendon to the French Minister (copy enclosed).
6. That there could be
doubt.
beloved
Your Landship
subsidized
that the Ara
bearing upon
wwo
was
question he (MHolland,
to state that in 1869 the Queens
Advocate
Consulted ai
to the
legality of an arrest at Stong
come sailors.
on
board
Kong of the Messageries Imperiales Steamer
"Segre "
4. That in his first
opinion he assumed that the
was
Tigri Conveyance of
in the
not engaged in the
of correspondence, but of luggage only that assumption he
Convey
and upon
arce
reported that the Tigre
was
not
ao
1.0
employed in excention of Articles 1 & 2 of the Convention so be within the scope of Art: Y
5. That the Frenet
Ambassador when informed of that
opinion remonstrated a gainet
a gamet it,
was
a-a
the "Tigre", by the French
Government
7.
stances your
That Lindship requested to
in these cireuse
be favored with
our
opinion upon
the following questions!
which
1. Whether a
A
French Veper
engaged in the French Government Portal Service
and called in either recasionally
in the course of her -regularly
voyage at some British Port, was es
exempt under the terms of the Postar
Com
cution from the liability which altached to all other vessels for any damage which she might have done in collision with
collision with any other vessel.
Ze
fel
2. Whether if anch
hab
a
not within the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.